Typically, now, you initially view the images on a computer or television screen. You then order from the screen and have photographic prints in your hand a few weeks later. Digital printing can be done on an inkjet or color laser, but the latest photographic papers from Kodak and Fuji have a life-span of over 100 years. Many inkjet prints will fade decades sooner that photographic prints.
From the photographer's point
of view, proofs are becoming a liability. Dishonest clients are
scanning the proofs and making prints. Just as DVD manufacturers have
made it difficult to copy their product, photographers will move
towards proof presentations that protect the photographers' copyright.
Online proofing is a great solution.
Since
the year 2000, the Magazine Album (also called Template Album,
Table-top Album, Storybook Album) uses digital techniques to put more
than one image on a page. Is this a fad or a change in the classic
wedding album presentation? That's up to you to decide. I recommend
that you have your professional oversee the design and production of
the album, since complete wedding photography is the combination of
images captures on the wedding day and the final design, cropping,
color correction and special effects that complement the initial images.
The Magazine Albums allow facing pages to rub against each other. A well made binding minimizes shear, decreasing the abrasion.
Look for a variety in subject size - a mix of distant, medium and close-up pictures. Even with groups, lighting and posing should be interesting. The well posed bridal portrait should minimize the subjects' flaws (weight problem, blemishes, etc.) and express who the subject is and how he/she/they feel. The dramatic and scenic wedding image, like the red convertable on the show-room floor, attracts everyone's attention, but most brides and their families, like most car buyers, want what suits them personally. You want pictures that tell the story simply, with immediate impact, and as if the photographer was not even there.
It's like fixing your hair or applying make-up so that it looks natural.
The photographer can produce several versions of the same image: soft, sharp, color, sepia, black and white, or with special effects and filters. Ideally, the photographer you like also limits or expands his/her arsenal of special effects to match your taste.
Film allows more room for operator error in terms of exposure and lighting. Digital is more technically demanding. Many of my brides are scared of digital because they have seen such bad results - either their own or other photographers' work. You should expect digital to look as good as or better than film.
Portraits of individuals or couples should look real. If they look like they were waiting for their picture to be taken, it was poorly posed. Group photos will have more of a sense of waiting to have the camera click because everyone needs to be looking towards the camera (in at least some of the shots). In group photographs the heads should be evenly spaced, nobody should look awkard, and everybody should have good skin tones - neither over-exposed nor under-exposed.
The Shot List
can get in the way of the photographer doing his/her style of
photography. A professional should get every obvious family grouping
that the family tree suggests. If you need to remind the photographer,
"Get a picture of the bride and her mom," then you have the wrong
photographer at your wedding!
And, there are photographers who produce an entire album's worth of images without ever going to the reception - they just need the time and locations, then can be on their way as you head off into your reception.
Most brides don't want to be overwhelmed with thousands of images from their wedding day. One photographer can provide you with more than enough images.